Committee on Development (DEVE)

Our best shot: with vaccines providing the most promising route out of the pandemic and the threat of new vaccine-resistant variants looming with every new infection, what can the EU do to ensure even access and distribution across the globe?

Chairperson: Lucía Sancho (ES)

Introduction and relevance to the topic

The current coronavirus pandemic has caused more than 700.000 deaths in the EU, as of October 2021, and there have been around 237 million confirmed cases worldwide. Although there are several mass vaccination programmes, half of the population globally still has not received their vaccine dose, and 50 countries did not achieve  the World Health Organisation (WHO) target (having 10% of their population fully vaccinated by the end of September). 

According to the WHO, the first mass vaccination programme started in December 2020. At the moment, 13 different vaccines have been approved by the WHO, e.g. AstraZeneca, Moderna, Janssen and Sonopharm. Scientists believe vaccination to be the most efficient long-term solution to the virus. Even though the vaccine doesn’t prevent the spread of the virus, it lessens the symptoms or severity of disease. 

However, some of these vaccines may not protect for as long as they should, due to the many variants of the virus. Moreover, the access and distribution of vaccines among different countries is not equal as there is a large gap between the vaccinated population in Western European countries, Africa, Eastern Europe as well as several Asian areas.

The more possibilities a virus has to spread, the more it replicates, creating more variants. Most of these mutations do not have a huge impact on the abilities of the virus. However, some Covid-19 variants have evolved into more contagious and severe viruses. Scientists now focus on a potential new threat: people who have had COVID-19 may remain susceptible to reinfection, and proven vaccines may, at some point, need an update. Due to this, global access and distribution of vaccines must be achieved as soon as possible, or else the virus will continue spreading, provoking deaths and creating dangerous variants.

Key conflicts

More than 50 countries have missed the World Health Organization’s (WHO) target for 10% of their population to be fully vaccinated against Covid-19 by the end of September. Many of these are low-income countries dealing with health infrastructure issues or suffering from conflict or civil unrest. The others have been affected by natural disasters, making the vaccine distribution process even more difficult. Some of these countries also fail to distribute the vaccine among their citizens before it expires. For instance, 24 countries, almost all of them in Africa, report using less than a third of their vaccines due to this issue. 15 of those report using less than a fourth. The reasons might be the insufficient international help to cover the logistic cost of mass vaccination and the recent news about extremely rare but potentially deadly side effects of some of the vaccines. Although research has not directly attributed any death to any of the Covid-19 vaccines, fake news has become a great barrier to global immunization and has led to anti-vaccination groups. Even in developed countries, such as the US, 33% of the population do not want the vaccine due to the misinformation that is being spread concerning its side effects.  

In addition, there are several difficulties when it comes to the vaccine administration. All the vaccines carry different handling requirements, storage protocols and guidelines for thawing and timing doses. Healthcare workers need instruction about the distribution and  storage of each vaccine. Many countries simply can not afford this training. With the increasing variants and mutations of COVID-19, healthcare workers will need up-to-date training for every new vaccine. 

Furthermore, during the pandemic, each state, tribe and territory has developed its own process for distributing the vaccine to the citizens in their jurisdiction. Non-governmental organisations do not have the power to coordinate the distribution of the vaccines once they have arrived in the country. Although organisations such as the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) shared relevant guidance, it is up to each state to decide whether to accept it or not.  Even inside of the European Union, vaccination policy is a competence of national authorities meaning the EU can only assist and recommend actions. Also, compulsory vaccination is an interference with the human right of bodily integrity, which is a part of the right to private life enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as well as in the European Convention on Human Rights, meaning that global vaccination can only be achieved if all governments and citizens agree to it. 

Lastly, even with a proper scheduling system, planning appointments for vaccination is complicated to manage, keeping in mind that vaccine shipments might not arrive or are inconsistent in some areas of the globe. Also, there is a lack of transparency about Covid-19 vaccines, which leads to corrupt networks or even stolen or diverted vaccines. These situations increase the hardships with consistent and safe distribution. 

Key actors

Measures in place

Moreover, there are many global collaborations to accelerate the development and access to COVID-19 vaccines. Two of these are The Access to COVID-19 Tools (ACT) Accelerator and  the Task Force. The Task Force is a joint initiative from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank Group, World Health Organization (WHO) and World Trade Organization (WTO) aiming to accelerate access to COVID-19 vaccines by offering finance and trade solutions for low- and middle- income countries. They also met with the CEOs of leading vaccine manufacturing companies to discuss and express concerns about not reaching their target of vaccinating at least 40% of the global population by the end of 2021. They suggested distributing doses to low- and lower middle-income countries, demonstrating transparency on vaccine supply, eliminating export restrictions and prohibitions as well as regulating streamlining and harmonisation. Finally, there are other organisations and mechanisms such as the African Vaccine Acquisition Trust (AVAT) and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) that play a significant role in equal vaccine distribution.

Questions to think about

• How can new variants of the COVID-19 virus be prevented in order to avoid the need of redistribution of new vaccines in the future?
• How can it be ensured that low-income countries use their vaccines before they expire?
• How can the EU increase equal access to vaccines outside of the European Union?
• How can healthcare workers in low- and lower middle-income countries receive the necessary training in order to efficiently store and distribute the vaccines?
• How can the EU  ensure that there is enough transparency regarding the distribution and access to vaccines in all countries?

Links for further research

• Challenges of rolling out Covid-19 vaccination in low-and middle-income countries
• Women in low-income countries denied access to COVID vaccines
• COVAX has so far shipped over 365 million COVID-19 vaccines
• More empty promises about global COVID-19 vaccine equity
• The EU promised 200M vaccine doses
• The EU’s contribution to global vaccine solidarity
• Global Covid-19 Vaccine Distribution Handbook

Introductory Clauses

The European Youth Parliament,

1. Acknowledging the fact that more than 50 countries have missed the Global Health Organization’s target for vaccination,
2. Underlining the fact that 24 countries report not using in their vaccines before they expire,
3. Noting with concern the high prices of the vaccines and the logistic cost of mass vaccination programs, 
4. Taking into consideration that vaccination policy is a competence of national authorities,
5. Pointing out that healthcare workers need instruction about handling requirements, storage protocols and guidelines for thawing and timing doses for every different vaccine,
6. Deeply concerned by the widely spread fake news concerning side effects of coronavirus vaccine and the anti-vaccination groups,
7. Aware of the lack of transparency and the increasing corruption regarding vaccines,
8. Regretting the current inconsistent distribution of vaccines around the globe,
9. Expressing it’s satisfaction that the European Commission has created a(n):
   1. EU Vaccine Strategy ensuring access to vaccines to all Member States,
   2. Vaccine sharing mechanism allowing Member States to share EU purchased doses to third countries,
   3. Initiative  called “Team Europe” enabling local manufacturing of the vaccines in Africa;

Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON)

Home is where the slum landlord is: with urban property prices on the increase, some citizens are left unable to access housing, therefore unable to fully enjoy the socioeconomic opportunities offered by European cities. What measures can governments take in ensuring all citizens access affordable housing in urban areas?

Chairperson: Carla Sava (RO)

Introduction and relevance of the topic

Decent housing is universally viewed as a basic human need, being associated with safety, high levels of productivity and wellbeing and great opportunities. However, nowadays it’s increasingly difficult to have a roof under our head, as many European countries are confronting soaring housing prices. Between 2007 and 2019, housing prices increased by 19% across the European Union (EU), conversely wages are not keeping pace. 

This trend of high prices can be explained from various perspectives. In many large European cities, housing and renting prices have been pushed up by low interest rates, land shortages, an increased consumers’ confidence to enter the real estate market and construction that cannot keep pace with demand. 

This approach to see housing as a commodity and not a fundamental right have left some European citizens behind in the long run. For almost two years now, the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted social protection systems, affecting  people who were already unable to access proper housing: the poorest, the homeless, those in insecure employment and young people .

Additionally, the economic consequences of the pandemic led to the young generation being unable to find a home in an exclusionary and dysfunctional housing market. Living in a major city to study or work is a burden for students, who are competing in this market segment with families and tourists. Small housing units are not a solution either: the average rent for a one-bed apartment can be more than 100% of the income of a young person, as is the case in Paris, Amsterdam, Barcelona and Helsinki. 
The concept of housing affordability has become a central point of discussion across Europe. The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has outlined the importance of a secure and comfortable home for our state of health and mind. Yet for some of us having an adequate house is a pipe dream. Therefore, every effort needs to be made to build on effective and inclusive regulation of the housing market.

Key actors

Key conflicts

Measures in place

Questions to think about

• Are there any examples of European countries with functioning and accessible housing systems? If so, what may be the key element for these systems? If not, what do you think is missing for them to function?
• How can the EU dilemma between its limited competences and real concerns regarding housing policy be solved? 
• Do you think that social housing systems across Europe are efficient and adequate enough in order to be considered a solution for the homeless and those at risk of poverty?
• How do you think young people without employment prerequisites can  be considered as solvent as older and more financially-stable individuals to compete in the housing market?

Links for further research

• Europe’s housing prices continue to sour- Euronews 
• The 6th Overview of Housing Exclusion in Europe
• Overview of European Residential Markets
• Why house prices are rising so fast in a pandemic

Introductory clauses

The European Youth Parliament, 

1. Alarmed by the fact that housing prices increased by 19% across the European Union (EU) in the past decade,
2. Bearing in mind that the low interest rates set by the European Central Bank (ECB) create additional demand in the property sector,
3. Acknowledging that 27 Member States have ratified the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights where the right to adequate housing is stipulated, 
4. Nothing with regret that the Member State’s response to the EU’s housing crisis is unsatisfactory,
5. Further noting with deep concern that the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the EU housing systems, affecting:
   1. the homeless population and low-income citizens,
   2. people in insecure employment;
   3. young people,
6. Gravely concerned by the increasing economic and social segregation between high-income and low-income households across the EU, in the form of:
   1. unequal access to medical services and the labour market,
   2. negative effects on young people’s educational attainment and career prospects;
7. Fully alarmed that 96.5 million Europeans are at risk of poverty or social exclusion are either homeless or overburdened by housing costs,,
8. Deploring that 17% of the EU population live in overcrowded accommodation, hindering the need to self-isolate and protect from COVID-19 and contributing to higher infection and death rates during the pandemic,
9. Expressing its satisfaction with the implementation of the Urban Agenda for the EU